Separation of Church and State
Then the Pharisees went out and laid plans to trap him in his words. They sent their disciples to him along with the Herodians. “Teacher,” they said, “we know you are a man of integrity and that you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. You aren’t swayed by men, because you pay no attention to who they are. Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not?” – Matthew 22:15-17
Dear Friends,
In chapter 22 of the Gospel of Matthew, both the Pharisees and Sadducees continue to confront Jesus. Having failed in their direct attack on Jesus’ authority in chapter 21, they change their tactics and try to trick Jesus and “trap him in his words.” In today’s verses, the Pharisees, a religious sect, are joined by the Herodians, a political party.
First, it is amazing to me how after 2,000 years, nothing has changed. These politicians and religious leaders come at Jesus first with flattery, which is ironic because in their own words they admit that Jesus isn’t swayed by men because He knows who they really are.
Second, by joining these two groups together, it is no wonder that their question involves God and taxes. Of course, we all know Jesus’ reply, “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and unto God what is God’s.” The joining of religious leaders and politicians occurs in our day as well and in my sight it is equally destructive for the church.
During the Bush administration, the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives was established. The goal was to encourage faith-based organizations to seek federal funding to address issues such as drug addiction and homelessness. On February 5, 2009, President Obama established a similar office called the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Partnerships. While President Obama has tried to distinguish his program from the Bush initiative by making the funds available to secular groups as well as religious, it is in essence the same program.
Many religious groups have heralded these initiatives as a good thing, but if given the opportunity to receive federal funding, I would say “no thank you,” because that money comes with a price. Just ask the CEOs of the banks and the auto industries who have been called to Washington to account for the money they have received. President Obama himself has said in regard to his faith-based initiative, “If you get a federal grant, you can’t use that grant money to proselytize to the people you help.”
Can’t proselytize! To proselytize IS why we do missions. It is a means by which we spread the Gospel. Feeding the hungry, giving shelter to the homeless, caring for the sick, all of these things are good things, but they are of temporal value only. If we are not first concerned about the eternal condition of the lost, all of the temporal work we do is in vain. If taking federal money means that I can’t preach the Gospel, then I will do with whatever God provides to me – which by the way, I know will be sufficient.
“Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and render unto God what is God’s.” This, I believe is a two-way street. While we are to live in obedience to earthly rulers so far as it does not violate our faith, we must not be yoked to anyone or anything that would suppress the truth in rightousness. Keep them separate.
In Christ,
David